Qualitative research

/ Uncategorized / By

ANSWER

Criticism of Qualitative Research Reports
Qualitative research: what is it?
Through the gathering of non-numerical data from sources like observations, interviews, and text analysis, qualitative research investigates phenomena. It aims to comprehend social circumstances, perspectives, and experiences.

Qualitative research characteristics
focuses on investigating and comprehending personal experiences.
makes use of techniques such as ethnography, focus groups, and interviews.
Descriptive data is subjected to inductive analysis.
The results are specific and cannot be applied to other contexts.
Nursing Concerns Fit for Qualitative Investigations
gaining insight into the experiences of patients (e.g., living with chronic illness).
investigating how people view care.
looking at how culture affects health-related habits.
Comparing Qualitative Approaches
Living experiences are the main focus of phenomenology.
The goal of grounded theory is to create a hypothesis that is supported by evidence.
Ethnography is the study of cultural customs and values.
The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research
Strengths: Captures the complexity of human experiences and offers deep, comprehensive insight.
Weaknesses: Time-consuming, subjective, and restricted in generalizability.
Evaluation of a Selected Qualitative Research Project Goal
Examine the real-life experiences of hemodialysis patients.
Design Suitability
To investigate participants’ lived experiences, a phenomenological design is suitable.
Moral Concerns
Confidentiality and informed consent were discussed. An institutional review board was used to guarantee ethical oversight.
Recruitment and Sampling Technique: Purposive sampling of twelve participants.
Appropriateness: The sampling is in line with the goal of thoroughly examining particular experiences.
Semi-structured interviews were used as the data collection method.
Appropriateness: Complies with the goal of comprehending individual stories.
Thematic analysis is the method used to find recurring themes in the data.
Appropriateness: Fit for investigating events and patterns.
Credibility, transferability, reliability, and confirmability are rigor criteria.
Evaluation of Rigor: Credibility and dependability were guaranteed by member inspections and audit records.
Results and Restrictions
Results: Resilience and emotional stress were identified as themes.
Restrictions: Results are context-specific and the sample size is small.
Dependability and Relevance
The study’s meticulous methodology makes it reliable. It offers insightful information for enhancing nursing’s patient-centered care.
Criticism of Quantitative Research Reports
Quantitative research: what is it?
In order to test theories and identify correlations, quantitative research uses statistical analysis and numerical data to investigate phenomena.

Qualities of Quantitative Studies
focuses on statistical analysis and objective measurement.
makes use of organized instruments such as experiments and surveys.
Numerical data is subjected to deductive analysis.
Nursing Concerns Appropriate for Quantitative Studies
evaluating how well interventions are.
investigating the relationships between different variables (e.g., smoking and lung cancer).
Designs for Research
Observational: non-interventionist; emphasizes the natural world.
Interventional: Examines the impact of a course of action or therapy.
Experimental: Makes use of control groups and randomization.
Quasi-Experimental: Does not have complete control or randomization.
Comparing Descriptive and Inferential Data
Descriptive: Provides an overview of the data (e.g., mean, median).
Inferential: Makes inferences about populations using techniques like ANOVA and t-tests.
Evaluation of a Selected Quantitative Study with a Study Goal
Assess the efficacy of a novel pain management strategy in individuals recovering from surgery.
Design Suitability
It is appropriate to use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the intervention’s effectiveness.
Randomization and Blinding
Blinding: To lessen bias, participants and researchers were blinded.
By guaranteeing equal groupings, randomization improved internal validity.
Moral Concerns
Consent was acquired with knowledge. Participant safety was guaranteed by ethical oversight.
Convenience sampling is the sampling technique.
Power analysis was used to determine the sample size in order to guarantee statistical validity.
Appropriateness: Compliant with the experimental design of the study.
Data collection Method: A validated numerical pain scale was used to measure pain levels.
Validity and Reliability: Accuracy and consistency were guaranteed by pre-testing the scale.
T-tests and ANOVA are used as data analysis methods to compare group differences.
Level of Measurement: Pain levels on an interval scale suitable for the tests being administered.
Results and Restrictions
Results: Postoperative pain was significantly decreased by the intervention (p < 0.05).
Limitations: Generalizability is limited by the small sample size and single-site study.
Dependability and Relevance
The results are relevant to nursing practice and statistically significant. The study backs evidence-based pain management guidelines.
In conclusion
Both qualitative and quantitative research are critiqued in order to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each methodology. While quantitative research offers quantifiable and broadly applicable facts, qualitative research brings depth and perspective. The advancement of evidence-based nursing practice depends on both designs.

 

 

QUESTION

select one research report with a qualitative design and one with quantitative design and answer the following questions regarding the following categories:

  1. Discuss what is meant by the term Qualitative Research
    • Briefly, describe the characteristics of qualitative research and identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a qualitative research approach.
    • Compare and contrast three different qualitative research methodologies.
    • Briefly, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research evidence for informing nursing practice.
    • Communicate how this research design used in research.
  2. The study, sampling, data collection, analysis, rigor, findings and limitations
    • Identify the purpose of the study.
    • Briefly, describe the design of the study and explain why you think it is either appropriate or inappropriate to meet the purpose.
    • Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    • Identify the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
    • Discuss whether sampling and recruitment were appropriate to the aims of the research.
    • Identify the data collection method(s) and discuss whether the method(s) is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    • Identify how the data was analyzed and discuss whether the method(s) of analysis is/are appropriate to the aims of the study.
    • Identify four (4) criteria by which the rigor of a qualitative project can be judged.
    • Discuss the rigor of this study using the four criteria.
    • Briefly, describe the findings of the study and identify any limitations.
    • Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion any implications for the discipline of nursing.
  3. Discuss what you understand by the term Quantitative Research – Use the following dot points to guide your discussion (give reasons for your argument and support with references):
    • Describe the characteristics of quantitative research.
    • Identify nursing issues/phenomena that lend themselves to a quantitative research approach
    • Differentiate between observational and interventional research designs and also between experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
    • Briefly, outline the difference between inferential and descriptive statistics and their relationship to levels of measurement.
    • Communicate how this research design used in research.
  4. Critique the Quantitative Research Report – Use the following headings to guide your critique (in all discussions and explanations give reasons for your argument and support with references):
    • The study
      • Identify the purpose and design of the study.
      • Explain what is meant by ‘blinding’ and ‘randomization’ and discuss how these were addressed in the design of the study.
      • Identify ethical issues related to the study and how they were/were not addressed.
    •  Sampling
      • Explain the sampling method and recruitment strategy that was used.
      • Discuss how the sample size was determined – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    • Data collection
      • Briefly, outline how the data was collected and identify any data collection instrument(s).
      • Define the terms validity and reliability and discuss how the validity & reliability of the instruments were/were not addressed in this study and why this is important.
    • Data analysis
      • Outline how the data were analyzed.
      • Identify the statistics used and the level of measurement of the data described by each statistical test – include in your discussion an explanation of terms used.
    • Findings and limitations
      • Briefly, outline the findings and identify any limitations of the study
      • Use the information that you have gained from your critique of the study to briefly discuss the trustworthiness and applicability of the study. Include in your discussion an explanation of the term statistical significance and name the tests of statistical significance used in this study.

Submission Instructions:

  • APA style
  • 4-5 pages
  • 3 journal articles
Scroll to Top