Healthcare Program/ Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

Healthcare Program/ Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

Name
Course
Institution Affiliation
Instructor
Due Date

Hospital Readmission Reduction Program Analysis
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).
After scrutinizing the issues affecting patients and healthcare workers, I selected the particular program because patient readmission stood out as the most critical factor for patient outcome.
Description Healthcare providers should collaborate to provide quality patient care and patient outcome. Hospital readmission is a result of many factors. The increased pressure to treat patients within the shortest time possible could result in poor patient care and patient outcomes, leading to hospital readmissions. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program aims at eliminating the rates and cases of patients developing complications within 30 days after hospital discharge.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? The program evaluation studied the physical, social, and financial impacts of hospital readmission on the patients and nursing providers. The success of the program was measured by analyzing the goals and objectives met by the program. Feedback from nurses, patients, and their caregivers was also obtained and analyzed to measure the success rate. The number of readmission cases was recorded compared to the previous years, where the program was not in use.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected The program has reached all populations of patients. Most of the hospital readmissions cases happen to older patients. The program has effectively serviced all states in the country. In each state a minimum of 200 health facilities were targeted.
How much of an impact was realized with the program selected? There have been significant reductions in the cases of readmission for vulnerable populations after the program was effected. Improved patient care and outcome doubled as a result of the program. more patients recorded patient satisfaction due to reduced health care costs. Better communication between the health practitioners and patient or the caregiver was developed before and during the discharge period to avoid readmissions.
At what point in the program implementation was the policy/program evaluation conducted? The program evaluation was conducted after the program was created, analyzed and monitored, and implemented. The reason is that the program is required to meet specified medical standards and patient satisfaction.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation Several data were used to conduct the hospital readmission reduction program. Three medical conditions were included in the analysis of the hospital readmission reduction program, HF AMI and pneumonia. A total of 150 patients from the three states and above the ages of 65 were used to evaluate the program. Cases of patients with developed medical complications were identified, and the cases were analyzed individually.
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified HRRP was implemented in my facility of work to reduce the number of readmission cases. The efforts of preventing hospital readmission affected a number of patient care quality. The rate of patient mortality increased significantly after discharging from the hospital. Twenty patients under study died within 30 days of discharge. Patients under investigation were cared for in observation units as an alternative to inpatients units. This led to poor patient care resulting in their deaths.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program? who would benefit the most from the results The program involved various stakeholders, namely; patients, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, care providers, hospital administration, and insurance companies. The most beneficiary stakeholder would be the patients. Patients reported that the program lowered their costs for treatments and improved the general quality of medical services.
Did the program meet the original intended and objectives The program met all intended objectives. The number of patient readmission reduced significantly. The number of medical errors caused by nurses in the hospitals was reduced by half. There were few cases of complications developed in discharged patients’ homes.
Would you recommend this program in your place of work I would recommend the HRR program to my health facility due to its enormous advantages. The hospital readmission reduction program has several benefits not only to the patients but also to all the other stakeholders.
Identify ways that you, as a nurse, would become involved in evaluating a program after one year of implementation Nurses need to assume leadership roles in program evaluation after its implementation. The first step I would conduct in the program evaluation is to engage the stakeholders, especially the patients. I would ask for their opinions on the new services they receive and how to better conduct healthcare provision. I could also contribute to the setting of new procedures and processes to be included in the project.

Reference
Albritton, J., Belnap, T., & Savitz, L. (2017). The effect of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program on the duration of observation stays: using regression discontinuity to estimate causal effects., 5(3).
Banerjee, S. C., Manna, R., Coyle, N., Penn, S., Gallegos, T. E., Zaider, T., … & Parker, P. A. (2017). The implementation and evaluation of a communication skills training program for oncology nurses. Translational behavioral medicine, 7(3), 615-623.
Krumholz, H. M., Wang, K., Lin, Z., Dharmarajan, K., Horwitz, L. I., Ross, J. S., … & Normand, S. L. T. (2017). Hospital-readmission risk—isolating hospital effects from patient effects. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(11), 1055-1064.
McCarthy, C. P., Vaduganathan, M., Patel, K. V., Lalani, H. S., Ayers, C., Bhatt, D. L., … & Pandey, A. (2019). Association of the new peer group–stratified method with the reclassification of penalty status in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. JAMA network open, 2(4), e192987-e192987.
Ryan, A. M., Krinsky, S., Adler-Milstein, J., Damberg, C. L., Maurer, K. A., & Hollingsworth, J. M. (2017). Association between hospitals’ engagement in value-based reforms and readmission reduction in the hospital readmission reduction program. JAMA internal medicine, 177(6), 862-868.

Healthcare Program/ Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

Question
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.
Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.
To Prepare:
Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

Healthcare Program/ Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

Scroll to Top