Discuss the meaning of recovery in mental healthcare/ mental health nursing.
Discussion: Recovery in Mental Healthcare
Criterion Fail Criteria Pass Criteria
Discusses the meaning of recovery in mental healthcare/ mental health nursing, and identifies its principle tenets. Supports answer by referencing literature and evidence, and writes in manner consistent with academic conventions. The meaning of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing is not discussed. The principle tenets of recovery are not identified. Fails to use adequate literature and or evidence to support arguments. Overall quality of writing is so poor that the author's meaning is obscure, or ambiguous. Discusses the meaning of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing, and identifies the principle tenets in superficial manner. Supports arguments and discussion with minimal use of literature and evidence. May have frequent typographical errors and frequent referencing errors.
Discusses how recovery is applied in mental health nursing, and or mental healthcare in general. Supports answer by referencing literature and evidence, and writes in manner consistent with academic conventions. The application of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing is not discussed. Fails to use adequate literature and or evidence to support arguments. Overall quality of writing is so poor that the author's meaning is obscure, or ambiguous. Discusses how recovery is applied in mental healthcare/ mental health nursing in superficial manner. Supports arguments and discussion with minimal use of literature and evidence. May have frequent typographical errors and frequent referencing errors.
Discusses how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/alliances with consumers. Supports answer by referencing literature and evidence, and writes in manner consistent with academic conventions. How and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers is not discussed. Fails to use adequate literature and or evidence to support arguments. Overall quality of writing is so poor that the author's meaning is obscure, or ambiguous. Discusses how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers in superficial manner. Supports arguments and discussion with minimal use of literature and evidence. May have frequent typographical errors and frequent referencing errors.
In discussing the therapeutic
relationship/alliance, the discussion is related to recovery principles. Supports answer by referencing literature and evidence, and writes in manner consistent with academic conventions. The discussion of how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers is not related to recovery principles. Fails to use adequate literature and or evidence to support arguments. Overall quality of writing is so poor that the author's meaning is obscure, or ambiguous. The relation of recovery principles to the discussion of how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers is superficial. Supports arguments and discussion with minimal use of literature and evidence. May have frequent typographical errors and frequent referencing errors.
Credit Criteria Distinction Criteria High Distinction Criteria
Discusses the meaning of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing, and clearly identifies its principle tenets.
Discussion: Recovery in Mental Healthcare
Discussion: Recovery in Mental Healthcare
Discussion is sound, with clear understanding demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with adequate use of literature and evidence. May have infrequent typographical errors and minor referencing errors. Discusses the meaning of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing, and clearly identifies its principle tenets. Discussion is sophisticated, and a clear understanding is
demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with a wide range of literature and evidence. Typographical errors are infrequent and minor, and do not interfere with clarity or meaning. The meaning of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing is discussed with great sophistication. The principle tenets of recovery are clearly identified. The author has a clear understanding of the literature, and masterfully conveys this. Uses a range of high quality sources effectively. Writes with a high standard of clarity, and is typographically flawless.
Discusses how recovery is applied in mental healthcare/ mental health nursing. Discussion is sound, with clear understanding demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with adequate use of literature and evidence. May have infrequent typographical errors and minor referencing errors. Discusses how recovery is applied in mental healthcare/ mental health nursing. Discussion is sophisticated, and a clear understanding is demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with a wide range of literature and evidence. Typographical errors are infrequent and minor, and do not interfere with clarity or meaning. The application of recovery as it relates to mental healthcare/ mental health nursing is discussed with great sophistication. The author has a clear understanding of the literature, and masterfully conveys this. Uses a range of high quality sources effectively. Writes with a high standard of clarity, and is typographically flawless.
Discusses how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers. Discussion is sound, with clear understanding demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with adequate use of literature and evidence. May have infrequent typographical errors and minor referencing errors. Discusses how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers. Discussion is sophisticated, and a clear understanding is demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with a wide range of literature and evidence. Typographical errors are infrequent and minor, and do not interfere with clarity or meaning. How and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers is discussed with great sophistication. The author has a clear understanding of the literature, and masterfully conveys this. Uses a range of high quality sources effectively. Writes with a high standard of clarity, and is typographically flawless.
Relates recovery principles to the discussion of how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers.
Discussion is sound, with clear understanding demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with adequate use of literature and evidence. May have infrequent typographical errors and minor referencing errors. Relates recovery principles to the discussion of how and why nurses develop therapeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers. Discussion is sophisticated, and a clear understanding is
demonstrated. Supports arguments and discussion with a wide range of literature and evidence. Typographical errors are infrequent and minor, and do not interfere with clarity or meaning. The relation of recovery principles, to the discussion of how and why nurses develop therpaeutic relationships/ alliances with consumers, is conveyed with great sophistication. The author has a clear understanding of the literature, and masterfully conveys this. Uses a range of high quality sources effectively. Writes with a high standard of clarity, and is typographically flawless.You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.