ANSWER
Proposal for Intervention: Capstone Project Schedule
Title Page: Using Patient Education and Support to Address Medication Adherence
Name of Author, Course Institution Title Date
Overview
An outline of the issue
Give a summary of the specified problem. For instance: “Patients with chronic conditions who do not take their medications as prescribed experience worse health outcomes, more hospital stays, and higher healthcare expenses.” The goal of this study is to help hypertension individuals take their medications as prescribed.
Pertinence to Practice:
Describe the importance of this issue for nursing and patient care.
For instance: “Medication adherence is essential for managing long-term conditions like hypertension, but patients frequently struggle because of a lack of support, financial obstacles, or knowledge gaps.”
Management of Change and Leadership
Leadership’s role:
Talk about how crucial leadership is to recognizing and solving the issue.
For instance: “By encouraging a culture of quality improvement and offering essential resources for educational programs, nurse leaders play a crucial role.”
Techniques for Change Management:
Explain the change management model that was applied, such as Lewin’s Change Theory or Kotter’s Change Model.
For instance: “Kotter’s Eight-Step Model was used to ensure smooth implementation of the educational intervention, secure buy-in from stakeholders, and create a sense of urgency.”
Nursing Ethics in the Development of Interventions
Emphasize how the intervention was influenced by nursing ethics.
For instance: “In accordance with the ANA Code of Ethics, the intervention guarantees respect for patient autonomy by taking into account individual preferences and addressing barriers like literacy or financial constraints.”
The suggested course of action
An explanation of the intervention:
An illustration would be a lesson plan designed specifically for hypertension individuals that incorporates visual aids, prescription schedules, and individual counseling.
Include the instructional materials or educational brochure as an appendix.
Justification:
Describe how the intervention tackles the underlying issues that lead to non-adherence.
For instance, “The intervention empowers patients to take charge of their health by addressing knowledge gaps and fostering accountability.”
Strategies for Collaboration and Communication
Interacting with Stakeholders:
Determine the patient group and pertinent parties.
For instance, “adults with a diagnosis of hypertension who have demonstrated irregular medication use are included in the target group.” Community pharmacists, nurse educators, and primary care physicians collaborate.
Collecting Input:
Stress the importance of stakeholder and patient feedback.
For instance: “The educational materials were informed by patient input, which helped identify barriers like complicated dosing schedules and financial concerns.”
Communication Best Practices:
Make use of evidence-based tactics like teach-back techniques and motivational interviews.
Standards for Policies and Practices
guiding principles:
Consult the pertinent corporate policies and state board nursing requirements.
For instance, “The intervention complies with CMS’s guidelines for managing chronic diseases and the American Nurses Association’s standards for health education and promotion.”
The efficacy of standards
Provide studies that demonstrate how well these standards work to improve results.
For instance, research indicates that adherence initiatives that follow CMS guidelines result in a 20% decrease in hospital readmissions.
Effect on Safety, Costs, and Quality of Care:
Describe the ways in which the intervention enhances health outcomes.
For instance: “The intervention lowers the risk of complications and hospitalizations by improving medication adherence.”
Safety of Patients:
Talk about ways to avoid negative consequences.
For instance, “Medication calendars simplify complicated regimens, reducing errors.”
Cutting Costs:
Emphasize the system’s and each patient’s cost reductions.
For instance, “Enhanced compliance reduces the need for emergency room visits, leading to significant financial savings.”
Evidence in Support:
Provide research proving the therapeutic and financial advantages of comparable measures.
Technology Use, Community Resources, and Care Coordination:
Explain how technology helps to assist the intervention.
For instance, “Patients can monitor their progress and improve adherence with mobile apps for medication reminders.”
Coordination of Care:
Emphasize the support that care teams provide to patients.
For instance: “Nurses and pharmacists collaborate to offer continuing assistance and modify treatment regimens as necessary.”
Local Resources:
Find local resources, like financial aid programs or support groups.
In conclusion
Provide an overview of the issue, the solution, and the anticipated results.
Emphasize how crucial teamwork, leadership, and evidence-based practice are to success.
Citations
Provide a minimum of five academic sources in APA style.
The American Nurses Association, for instance (2021). Code of Ethics with Interpretations for Nurses. ANA Publications.
Medicare & Medicaid Services Centers (2020). services for managing chronic care. taken from XYZ on CMS.gov Author. (Year). The journal article’s title. Name of Journal, Issue Volume, Page Range.
Appendices
The teaching plan, pamphlet, or other deliverables are examples of educational materials or intervention products.
Additional Information:
Provide further graphs, charts, or baseline data summaries.
Extra Information
Before submitting, make sure the work is correctly formatted and proofread.
Before putting the intervention into practice, submit it for faculty review.
This methodology guarantees a thorough, fact-based proposal that satisfies every condition listed. Please let me know if you require any extra help writing a particular area!
QUESTION
Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are not to share your intervention with your patient, family, or group or move on to Assessment 5 before your faculty reviews/approves the solution you submit in Assessment 4. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
instructions
In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from the literature, from organizational data, and from direct consultation with the patient, family, or group (and perhaps with subject matter and industry experts) to your assessment of the problem. You’ve examined the problem from the perspectives of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy, quality of care, patient safety, costs to the system and individual, technology, care coordination, and community resources. Now it’s time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.
preparation
In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable results for the patient, family, or group. In addition, you might consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the following:
· Creating an educational brochure.
· Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic.
· Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group.
· Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic.
Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group.
In addition, you may wish to complete the following:
· Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed.
· Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your work and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence.
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.
INSTRUCTIONS
Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval.
Part 1
Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.
Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem:
· Leadership.
· Collaboration.
· Communication.
· Change management.
· Policy.
· Quality of care.
· Patient safety.
· Costs to the system and individual.
· Technology.
· Care coordination.
· Community resources.
Part 2
Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.
In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention.
· Summarize the patient, family, or population problem.
· Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project.
· Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group.
In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
· Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem.
· Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention.
· Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention.
· Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product.
· Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem.
· Identify the patient, family, or group.
· Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem.
· Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes.
· Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of your proposed intervention.
· Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work.
· Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem.
· Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual.
· Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
· Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual.
· Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem.
· Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions.
· Write concisely and directly, using active voice.
· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Additional Requirements
· Format: Format the written analysis of your intervention using APA style. APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is provided to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include:
· A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
· Appropriate section headings.
· Length: Your paper should be approximately 5–7 pages in length, not including the reference page.
· Supporting evidence: Cite at least five sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. Provide in-text citations and references in APA format.
· Proofreading: Proofread your paper, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on its substance.