Benefits, Criticism, and a Survival Guide for Peer Review in Scientific Publications
The process of subjecting an author’s scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field has been defined as peer review. Its purpose is to encourage authors to meet the accepted high standards of their discipline and to control the dissemination of research data in order to prevent unjustified claims, unacceptable interpretations, or personal views from being published without prior expert review. Despite its widespread use by most journals, the peer review process has been widely criticized for its slowness in publishing new findings and for perceived bias by editors and/or reviewers. Peer review has become an essential component of the academic writing process within the scientific community. It contributes to the assurance that papers published in scientific journals address meaningful research questions and reach accurate conclusions based on professionally executed experimentation. Low-quality manuscript submissions are becoming more common, and peer review serves as a filter to keep this work from reaching the scientific community. The primary benefit of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed articles are a reliable form of scientific communication. This trust is especially important because scientific knowledge is cumulative and builds on itself. Despite the positive effects of peer review, critics argue that the process stifles experimentation and serves as a poor screen against plagiarism. Despite its shortcomings, no foolproof system has yet been developed to replace peer review. However, researchers have been looking into electronic means of improving the peer review process. Regrettably, the recent surge in online-only and electronic journals has resulted in the mass publication of a large number of scientific articles with little or no peer review. This poses a significant risk to scientific progress and its future potential. The current article summarizes the peer review process, discusses the benefits and drawbacks of various types of peer review, and describes new methods for improving peer review.
ORDER WITH US AND GET FULL ASSIGNMENT HELP FOR THIS QUESTION AND ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENTS (PLAGIARISM FREE)