Advanced Levels of Clinical Enquiry and Systematic Reviews

/ Uncategorized / By

ANSWER

 

Advanced Levels of Clinical Enquiry and Systematic Reviews: evidence-based project
Slides 1: Title Slides
Title: Advancement of Clinical Enquiry Based on Evidence
Title: Approach a Clinical Issue Using Systematic Reviews
Your name, course name, date, institution.
Slide 2: Interest Clinical Issue
Selected Clinical Issue: How well mindfulness-based therapies (MBIs) lower stress among nurses employed in high-stress settings, such Intensive Care Units (ICUs)?
relevancy: Burnout, lower job satisfaction, and poor patient outcomes follow from stress among ICU nurses. Improving nurse well-being and patient care depends on addressing stress by evidence-based treatments like MBIs.
Slide 3: PIC(T) Question Development
PICO(T) P: ICU doctors under great work-related stress.
I: Mindfulness-based treatments (MBSR, MBCT).
C: Either no intervention or conventional stress-reducing strategies.
O: Lower apparent stress and raise job satisfaction.
T: 8–12 weeks of intervention.
Process: Found the issue—stress among ICU nurses.
looked over present plans and new ideas.
focused on contrasting over a set period mindfulness-based therapies with present practices.
Slides 4: Database for the Literary Search searched: CINAHL Plus with Full Text
PubMed Cooperatively Library of Coaching
psycINFO Search Strategy:
Keywords include “mindfulness-based interventions,” “ICU nurses,” “stress reduction,” “systematic review.”
For more exact searches, use AND or OR Boolean operators.
Slide 5: APA Style Selected Peer-Reviewed Articles with Citations
2019 Lomas, T., Medina, J. C., & Ivtzan, I. Mindfulness-based treatments in healthcare: a meta-analysis and methodical review Mindfulness, 10(3), 549-562. doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1059-2
Watanabe, M., and colleagues (2021). The impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction on ICU nurses: a meta-analysis 26(2) Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 213–230 doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000283
2020 Smith, A.; Brown, J.; Patel, R. Occupational stress mindfulness interventions: a systematic review Journal of nursing management, 28(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12398
Turner, R., & Jones, L. 2018 A thorough review shows how well short mindfulness therapies help healthcare professionals to lower their stress. nursing in critical care, 23(4), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12395
Slides 6: Levels of Evidence in Selected Works
2019 Lomas et al. meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Advantages: High dependability incorporates several RCTs and strong results on mindfulness efficiency.
Watanabe et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis especially with reference to ICU nurses.
Strengths: Aimed population increases relevance in ICU environments.
Smith et al. (2020) systematically compiled studies on occupational stress.
Strengths: More generalizability for healthcare professionals offered by a wider occupational scope.
Turner & Jones (2018): Systematic analysis of short interventions.
Strengths: Emphasises time-effective solutions for high demand settings including ICUs.
Slide 7: Systematic Reviews’ Strengths
Broad summary: Because they so thoroughly synthesise data from many studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are regarded as high degrees of evidence.
Strengthener, more generalizable findings are the advantage here.
Reduce prejudice with exacting technique.
By effectively summarising large amounts of research, help to guide healthcare decisions.
For instance, the 2021 meta-analysis by Watanabe et al. underlined the particular advantages of mindfulness programmes catered to ICU nurses, therefore providing practical advice for use.
Notes for Use in Presentation
Illustrate the synthesis of evidence using graphs, tables, or charts.
Keep slides simple, but throughout the presentation offer thorough vocal explanations.
For every reference, guarantee correct APA style and citation.

 

QUESTION

To Prepare:

  • Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified for the “search database Assignment” This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
  • Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden University Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
  • Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a decorative 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
  • Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Scroll to Top