ANSWER
To help you write your essay, consider the following recommended outline:
Title: An Evaluation of [Selected Ethical Theories] in Comparison
Overview
Goal: Explain the subject and give a synopsis of the two selected ethical philosophies.
Statement of the Thesis: Explain your major point, such as which ethical theory you believe to be more compelling or why you believe both approaches to ethics to be equally valid or flawed.
Give a brief synopsis of the main ideas that will be covered throughout the essay, including summaries and theoretical analysis.
Section 1: Overview of Ethical Theories
First Theory: [First Ethical Theory Name]
Describe and elucidate the theory’s key ideas.
Talk about its guiding principles, main proponents, and method for arriving at moral judgments.
For utilitarianism, for instance, talk about cost-benefit analysis, the utility principle, and the significance of happiness.
Theory 2: [Third Ethical Theory Name]
Describe and elucidate the theory’s key ideas.
Emphasize its main ideas, important figures, and ethical reasoning methodology.
For instance, describe universalizability, obligation, and the categorical imperative in relation to Kant’s deontology.
This part should be neutral and free of personal judgment.
Section 2: Evaluation and Contrast Advantages of Theory 1
Talk about the ways in which the first theory resolves ethical conundrums.
Give instances or situations where this theory works well.
Limitations of Theory 1
List the first theory’s drawbacks or objections.
To show where the theory might fall short, provide instances.
Advantages of Theory 2
Emphasize the second theory’s benefits and strengths.
Talk about real-world examples where this idea works well.
Limitations of Theory 2
Examine critically the drawbacks or difficulties with the second theory.
Give particular instances of its drawbacks.
Part 3: Justification for the Better Strategy
Examine the advantages and disadvantages of the two theories.
Make your case: Which theory is superior? Are they both just as good or just as bad? Why?
To bolster your argument, use instances and sound reasoning.
To support your position, talk about how these ideas might be used to address ethical conundrums in the actual world.
In conclusion
Summarize the essay’s primary ideas.
Summarize your final position and thesis.
Give a concluding statement regarding the significance of ethical theories in moral judgment and reasoning.
References Cite
Cite all of the sources you use in your essay using the APA, MLA, or Chicago styles. Make sure to include the course materials as well as any other resources that were used.
This format guarantees that your essay is coherent, satisfies the requirements of the assignment, and exhibits critical thinking. If you need assistance writing or honing your ideas, please let me know!
QUESTION
ESSAY CRITERIA PHIL-2306, Fall 2024
The essay is 100 points and is 25% of your final grade. This assignment is meant to test your ability to
explain ethics more in-depth and to show your own critical thinking on different approaches to ethics.
This must be a new essay written specifically for this class by you individually. You need approval from
your instructor before using part or all of an essay that was submitted for another class.
Topic: Pick any two out of the following ethical theories: Ethical egoism, utilitarianism, Kant’s
deontology, Aristotle’s virtue ethics, and Held’s care ethics. First, give you own cohesive summary of
each of the two theories you chose to focus on. Second, discuss what you see as the comparative
strengths and weaknesses of each theory and give your own argument for which is a better approach to
ethics and why (or why both are equally good or bad, etc.).
Summary: You must summarize each of the two theories you are discussing, in about a paragraph each
(or two each, if necessary). For this assignment, your summary should not give any judgment of each
theory, but simply present a neutral explanation of its main points (any evaluation should be in your
analysis). Your summary must be mostly in your own words; you can and should use key terms, and
limited use of direct quotes is helpful, but you cannot just copy the text, notes or other sources.
Analysis: You must discuss and explain what you see as the strengths and weaknesses of each theory and
give your own argument for which theory is better and why. This portion should not just repeat the
strengths and weaknesses given in the text and notes or outside sources; you must focus mainly on your
own clearly given analysis and your own rationally supported argument. You do not have to argue that
one theory is better than the other, as long as you have a clear conclusion that you argue for.
Example Topic: Compare utilitarianism and deontology. First, summarize the main points of each theory.
Then, give the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and end with your own clear argument for which
is a better approach to morality and why.
Setup: Your essay will have two main parts: first, a relevant summary of course material. Secondly, your
own critical analysis or argument regarding the theories you are addressing. You must have both parts,
and they should be roughly equal in length. In addition to those two main parts, your paper should further
begin with a one-paragraph introduction (including a thesis statement) and end with a one-paragraph
conclusion. Again, this must be a new paper written specifically for this course by you individually; you
cannot reuse any work from other courses (including taking Ethics previously) without approval.
Due Date and Submission:
Your essay must be submitted on ecampus by 11:59 PM on Thursday, October 3. You will upload
the essay as a Word document (.doc or .docx) to ecampus; it must be a Word document specifically. Your
essay will be run through Turnitin, software to help identify potential cases of plagiarism and check for
potential cases of uncited AI use in your writing (see below concerning AI use in your essay).
(continued on next page)
PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)
Length and Format: Your essay must be no less than 1000 words and should not be more than 1500
words. It should be 12” Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with 1” margins on all sides. Any essay
written below the minimum length will receive a lower grade (you may go beyond the upper word limit,
if necessary, but not too much). Headings, direct quotes, footnotes, your works cited list, etc. do not count
towards the 1000-1500 words.
Sources and Citation: All sources of information, including course materials, must be properly cited
according to either MLA, APA, or Chicago style citation, resources for which can be easily found online.
• You are required to cite the course materials relevant to the two theories you are writing on. You
may use the assigned reading, your notes from lecture, or the online course notes for this, or any
combination of the above.
• You may use outside sources if you want to, but it is not required; if you use any outside sources,
then you are required to properly cite them in your essay. Citing outside sources does not replace
the requirement to cite the relevant course material.
• Use of artificial intelligence or AI tools (for example, Chat GPT or similar) is strongly discouraged
on this assignment, as this assignment is meant to test your own writing, understanding, and critical
thinking. Very limited use of AI may be allowed but counts as an outside source and must be
properly cited; this includes a works cited entry, indicating all places in your writing where you
took information from AI, and using quotation marks when copying text directly.
Remember, anything that is not your own thinking or idea must be properly referenced! Proper citation
always includes two things: in-text citation (parenthetical references or footnotes) and full information for
each source at the end of the essay (a works cited list). Any use of a source that is not cited constitutes
plagiarism. Direct word-for-word copying from a source without use of both quotation marks and source
citation is also plagiarism. Plagiarism may result in a 0 on this assignment.
Grading: The essay as a whole is worth 100 points and is 25% of your final course grade. Your grade on
the assignment consists of the following criteria:
Summary (25 points): Give a clear and cohesive summary of two ethical theories, clearly covering the
most important aspects and overall main idea of each one.
Analysis (25 points): Compare what you see as the strengths and weakness of each ethical theory, and
give your own argument for which is better (or why both are equally good, etc.)
Critical Thinking (25 points): Be sure to show careful and consistent reasoning throughout your essay,
clearly explain your ideas, and give your own reasoning behind your judgments and conclusion.
Writing (25 points): Be sure to write clearly, properly cite all your sources, and make sure that your
essay is mostly free of spelling and grammar errors; submit essay in proper format.
Essays that are late and/or below the required word count will have points deducted
outside of this grading criteria.
Contact your instructor if you have any questions over the essay assignment!
- Essay Criteria
- PHIL-2306, Fall 2024
- PHIL 2306 – Essay Criteria (continued)